Fechar
Metadados

1. Identificação
Tipo de ReferênciaArtigo em Revista Científica (Journal Article)
Sitemtc-m21c.sid.inpe.br
Código do Detentorisadg {BR SPINPE} ibi 8JMKD3MGPCW/3DT298S
Identificador8JMKD3MGP3W34R/427NHRP
Repositóriosid.inpe.br/mtc-m21c/2020/03.25.12.17   (acesso restrito)
Última Atualização2020:03.25.12.17.09 (UTC) simone
Repositório de Metadadossid.inpe.br/mtc-m21c/2020/03.25.12.17.09
Última Atualização dos Metadados2022:01.04.01.35.02 (UTC) administrator
DOI10.3390/jmse8020137
ISSN2077-1312
Chave de CitaçãoReyMSMTFRAQ:2020:CaStPr
TítuloAssessing different flood risk and damage approaches: a case of study in progreso, Yucatan, Mexico
Ano2020
MêsFeb.
Data de Acesso13 maio 2024
Tipo de Trabalhojournal article
Tipo SecundárioPRE PI
Número de Arquivos1
Tamanho6617 KiB
2. Contextualização
Autor1 Rey, Wilmer
2 Martínez-Amador, Miranda
3 Salles, Paulo
4 Mendoza, E. Tonatiuh
5 Trejo-Rangel, Miguel Angel
6 Franklin, Gemma L.
7 Ruiz-Salcines, Pablo
8 Appendini, Christian M.
9 Quintero-Ibáñez, Julián
ORCID1 0000-0002-2983-5103
2
3 0000-0001-9072-8289
4 0000-0003-4416-4253
5
6
7 0000-0002-3075-9873
8 0000-0002-6044-3351
Grupo1
2
3
4
5 CST-CST-SESPG-INPE-MCTIC-GOV-BR
Afiliação1 Centro de Investigaciones Oceanograficas e Hidrograficas del Caribe (CIOH)
2 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM)
3 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM)
4 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM)
5 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
6 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM)
7 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM)
8 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM)
9 Centro de Investigaciones Oceanograficas e Hidrograficas del Caribe (CIOH)
Endereço de e-Mail do Autor1 w.reysanchez@gmail.com
2
3 psallesa@iingen.unam.mx
4 emendozap@iingen.unam.mx
5 miguel.rangel@inpe.br
6 GFranklin@iingen.unam.mx
7 pruizs@iingen.unam.mx
8 cappendinia@iingen.unam.mx
9 Jquinteroi@dimar.mil.co
RevistaJournal of Marine Science and Engineering
Volume8
Número2
Páginase137
Histórico (UTC)2020-03-25 12:18:03 :: simone -> administrator :: 2020
2022-01-04 01:35:02 :: administrator -> simone :: 2020
3. Conteúdo e estrutura
É a matriz ou uma cópia?é a matriz
Estágio do Conteúdoconcluido
Transferível1
Tipo do ConteúdoExternal Contribution
Tipo de Versãopublisher
Palavras-Chaveflood hazard
flood vulnerability
hydrodynamic modeling
CENAPRED
Yucatan State
ResumoThis study applies three different methods to assess the flood risk and damage from the strongest high-pressure cold front (locally known as 'Norte') event in terms of the residual tide from 30 years (1979-2008) of data for Progreso, Yucatan. The most important difference between the three methods is the estimation of flood vulnerability for Progreso. The first method, proposed by Mexico's National Center for the Prevention of Disasters (CENAPRED) and used by the Mexican government is based mostly on economic asset (household goods) values and flood impacts. The second (CENAPREDv2) and third (FRI) methods are proposals for assessing risk that include 17 socioeconomic indicators. The former includes economic asset values, as is the case for CENAPRED, while the latter does not. The main results of this study show that the modeled 'Norte' event flooded 25% of Progreso's city blocks, with an estimated economic flood risk of $USD 16,266 (CENAPRED) and $USD 223,779 (CENAPREDv2), and flood damage of $USD 48,848 and $USD 671,918, respectively. When calculating flood risk (FRI) and flood damage (FRI_FD) without monetary terms, the risk categories along the back-barrier behind Progreso varied spatially from 'very low' to 'high', while areas along the coastal side presented a 'low' and 'very low' risk. These categories increased for the flood damage because the exceedance probability of the flood was not considered as it was for flood risk in the three methodologies. Therefore, flood damage provides the losses caused by a given flood event without considering how probable that loss may be. In conclusion, this study proposes that the selection of the applied method depends on the main objectives and specific interests when assessing flood risk. For instance, if economic damage is the main concern, then the CENAPRED method should be used as it identifies where the larger economic impacts could occur; when a socioeconomic approach is needed then the FRI should be applied, but if both economic damage and socioeconomic aspects are needed, the CENAPREDv2 is recommended. Besides considering economic aspects, the FRI method also includes social variables that can help to map the most vulnerable population in terms of mobility, education, communication access and others. Therefore, the proposed FRI method is very relevant for disaster risk managers and other stakeholders interested in disaster risk reduction.
ÁreaCST
Arranjourlib.net > BDMCI > Fonds > Produção pgr ATUAIS > CST > Assessing different flood...
Conteúdo da Pasta docacessar
Conteúdo da Pasta sourcenão têm arquivos
Conteúdo da Pasta agreement
agreement.html 25/03/2020 09:17 1.0 KiB 
4. Condições de acesso e uso
Idiomaen
Arquivo Alvorey_assessing.pdf
Grupo de Usuáriossimone
Grupo de Leitoresadministrator
simone
Visibilidadeshown
Permissão de Leituradeny from all and allow from 150.163
Permissão de Atualizaçãonão transferida
5. Fontes relacionadas
Unidades Imediatamente Superiores8JMKD3MGPCW/449U4PL
Lista de Itens Citandosid.inpe.br/bibdigital/2021/03.06.05.18 3
DivulgaçãoWEBSCI; PORTALCAPES; SCOPUS.
Acervo Hospedeirourlib.net/www/2017/11.22.19.04
6. Notas
Campos Vaziosalternatejournal archivingpolicy archivist callnumber copyholder copyright creatorhistory descriptionlevel e-mailaddress format isbn label lineage mark mirrorrepository nextedition notes parameterlist parentrepositories previousedition previouslowerunit progress project resumeid rightsholder schedulinginformation secondarydate secondarykey secondarymark session shorttitle sponsor subject tertiarymark tertiarytype url
7. Controle da descrição
e-Mail (login)simone
atualizar 


Fechar